[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41

Subject: Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
From: "Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 20:48:15 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <03%Dj.28796$TT4.15036@attbi_s22> <709Ej.95998$pM4.38631@pd7urf1no> <JLhEj.83316$yE1.67322@attbi_s21> <frssrf$5ne$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <%rBEj.5447$CO3.2453@trnddc04>

"Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%rBEj.5447$CO3.2453@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Can you say UL.  I knew that you could.
>>
>> Another independent organization trying to get themselves legislated into
>> a state of monopoly power and control.
>
> UL isn't even truly independent.  Know what that "U" stands for?

Underwriters.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: Roland Moore

References:
- Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: RockyTSquirrel
- Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: RockyTSquirrel
- Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: I need SHIELDED 14/4
Next by Message: Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
Previous by thread: Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
Next by thread: Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home