[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41

Subject: Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
From: "Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:31:14 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <03%Dj.28796$TT4.15036@attbi_s22> <709Ej.95998$pM4.38631@pd7urf1no> <JLhEj.83316$yE1.67322@attbi_s21>

"RockyTSquirrel" <gafa_usa@/nospam/hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:JLhEj.83316$yE1.67322@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> No clue  Never seen this kind of BS  before.
> (However   the KBFAA ie  NBFAA  figures in the text of the bill.  they
> recommend members for the board and only them..)


Can you say UL.  I knew that you could.

Another independent organization trying to get themselves legislated into a
state of monopoly power and control.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: Robert L Bass

References:
- Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: RockyTSquirrel
- Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
  - From: RockyTSquirrel

Prev by Message: Re: Safewatch Pro 3000 arm/disam status
Next by Message: Tech Help April 2008
Previous by thread: Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
Next by thread: Re: Installers in Kentucky beware of HB-41
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home