Re: Dear "Well Known National Alarm Company":

[Bob <sp@xxxxxx>]

Frank Olson wrote:
> Frank Olson wrote:
>
>> Considering the occupancy, I'd say as far as is necessary to achieve
>> the maximum benefit.  In this case two separate technologies will be
>> used. A hard line (POTS) and GSM.
>>
>>
>>> As far back as the manhole from the street ?
>>
>> Either end of the building/structure.
>
> Actually this applies to the central station, not the monitored
> premises...  My bad.  Be that as it may, I've always been nervous
> employing a dual line communicator.  I've seen "hatchet jobs" on more
> than one main incoming drop.
right, next you'll be saying you flew upside down while selling
insurance. ;)