Re: Dear "Well Known National Alarm Company":

[Frank Olson <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Bob wrote:
> Frank Olson wrote:
>> Frank Olson wrote:
>>
>>> Considering the occupancy, I'd say as far as is necessary to achieve
>>> the maximum benefit.  In this case two separate technologies will be
>>> used. A hard line (POTS) and GSM.
>>>
>>>
>>>> As far back as the manhole from the street ?
>>>
>>> Either end of the building/structure.
>>
>> Actually this applies to the central station, not the monitored
>> premises...  My bad.  Be that as it may, I've always been nervous
>> employing a dual line communicator.  I've seen "hatchet jobs" on more
>> than one main incoming drop.
> right, next you'll be saying you flew upside down while selling
> insurance. ;)


Heh...