Re: Dear "Well Known National Alarm Company":

[Frank Olson <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Frank Olson wrote:

> Considering the occupancy, I'd say as far as is necessary to achieve the
> maximum benefit.  In this case two separate technologies will be used. A
> hard line (POTS) and GSM.
>
>
>> As far back as the manhole from the street ?
>
> Either end of the building/structure.

Actually this applies to the central station, not the monitored
premises...  My bad.  Be that as it may, I've always been nervous
employing a dual line communicator.  I've seen "hatchet jobs" on more
than one main incoming drop.