Re: NX8- V2 not uploading

["Mark Leuck" <mleuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Russell Brill" <russwbrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:BZidnSegFupPjpnVnZ2dnUVZ_judnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Mark Leuck" <mleuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:4803fac1$0$9509$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> There is nothing wrong with the NX-8 in fact GE has greatly improved it
>> with the V2 series
>>
>> Hell my favorite test panel is a v2 NX-8, I've got it loaded down with
>> keypads, receivers, a 534 2-way board and I connect to it over the
>> network, the ONLY thing I can think of to critisize it is that it takes
>> forever to upload the alpha text. I have had no problems connecting to
>> any NX panel, I have configured over 20 workstations which also have no
>> problems and I'm using the same modem he is.
>>
>> But the worst insult is you dare compared that POS Napco 1632 to it
>
> I never compared the GEM-P1632 to the NX-8V2, I offered it as an
> alternative to GE's trash can panel. I never said it would do all of the
> things the NX-8 is supposed to do. The GEM-P1632 is not State-of-the-Art,
> however, it consistantly performs as specified by Napco. I doubt anyone
> can claim the same for ANY of these $50 do-it-all panels. I apply KISS
> (Keep it simple stupid) to most installations because very few jobs that I
> get require a MONSTER panel that can do everything conceivable to man. I
> do have some older NX-8's installed, never had a problem with them. It's
> been a differrent story for the NX-8V2. As I mentioned in an earlier post,
> the V2 did some funny things that I've never had happen with the POS you
> mentioned. I think I'll stick with the Pile I'm used to, and you seem to
> enjoy the smell of your Pile, so wag your tail and dig in :-))

All I can say is it's a good thing you didn't compare it to an AT&T 8000,
then I'd really be upset