Re: NX8- V2 not uploading

["Russell Brill" <russwbrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Mark Leuck" <mleuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4803fac1$0$9509$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> There is nothing wrong with the NX-8 in fact GE has greatly improved it
> with the V2 series
>
> Hell my favorite test panel is a v2 NX-8, I've got it loaded down with
> keypads, receivers, a 534 2-way board and I connect to it over the
> network, the ONLY thing I can think of to critisize it is that it takes
> forever to upload the alpha text. I have had no problems connecting to any
> NX panel, I have configured over 20 workstations which also have no
> problems and I'm using the same modem he is.
>
> But the worst insult is you dare compared that POS Napco 1632 to it

I never compared the GEM-P1632 to the NX-8V2, I offered it as an alternative
to GE's trash can panel. I never said it would do all of the things the NX-8
is supposed to do. The GEM-P1632 is not State-of-the-Art, however, it
consistantly performs as specified by Napco. I doubt anyone can claim the
same for ANY of these $50 do-it-all panels. I apply KISS (Keep it simple
stupid) to most installations because very few jobs that I get require a
MONSTER panel that can do everything conceivable to man. I do have some
older NX-8's installed, never had a problem with them. It's been a
differrent story for the NX-8V2. As I mentioned in an earlier post, the V2
did some funny things that I've never had happen with the POS you mentioned.
I think I'll stick with the Pile I'm used to, and you seem to enjoy the
smell of your Pile, so wag your tail and dig in :-))

>
> "Russell Brill" <russwbrill@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:I5mdnWrDpuW_A5_VnZ2dnUVZ_tWtnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> It's sad, the NX-8 used to be a good panel before GE got their hands on
>> it... Check out the Napco Gemini P1632, it's simple, but effective.....
>>
>> Good Luck,
>> Russ
>>
>> "RockyTSquirrel" <gafa_usa@/nospam/hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:HGwMj.65724$TT4.19375@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> That crossed my mind,
>>> However  since this was a test to see how reliable the NX8 systems would
>>> be.
>>> General thinking now is to tell the dist. salesperson to have it back..
>>> We'll move on to another panel for testing.
>>> Tks.
>>>
>>> "ABLE_1" <royboynospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:AOWdnWnpeqT_7J_VnZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>
>>>> This is a job for ......................................
>>>  1-888-437-3287 --
>>>> 2 -- 1 -- 1
>>>>
>>>> Remember to tell them NOT to say;  "Never heard of that before."
>>>>
>>>> Les
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Yep,  DL-900,  fresh off the GE website.
>>>> > Panel  fresh from the dist..
>>>> >
>>>> > running the software  on an ME machine  using a Hayes Opima 24
>>>> > modem..
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > "ABLE_1" <royboynospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> > news:6_idnYX-wt5j85_VnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> >>
>>>> >> "RockyTSquirrel" <gafa_usa@/nospam/hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> >> news:%OtMj.118805$yE1.114636@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> >> > Anyone else having problems with the new GE Security NX8-v2  not
>>>> >> > uploading.
>>>> >> > using the DL-900 software,
>>>> >> >  panel answers and tones for several seconds
>>>> >> >  then popup screen says that the panel is not supported by this
>>>> > software..
>>>> >> > We've tried all the available versions of the NX8 listed in the
>>>> > software..
>>>> >> >  same popup with each one..
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > RTS
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I have not had the problems you describe.  You are using the latest
>>>> > version
>>>> >> of DL900 and are choosing NX8-V2 as the panel??  Correct???
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>