Re: NX591Egsm

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Sep 14, 6:05?pm, "Just Looking" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >rather than wanting to be confused with me.
>
> Well after you post a long Bass rant we're all a little confused with you.
> Unfortunately by using the name Jim he may be mistakenly identified as you
> too. An inadvertent flame or two sent his way, instead of yours of course,
> will straighten things out for him I feel certain. Maybe he could use "Not
> that Jim" as his name?
>

You must be mistaking me for some one else. I very seldom post "long"
Dead Ass rants. Occasionally but not often. But please, ...... DO
identifiy who "we're all" are.

And .... well .....yes, as a matter of fact I WAS concerned about him
being mistakenly identified with me. I wouldn't want anyone else being
given credit for telling Dead Ass to hurry up and dig his grave.

As far as inadvertent flames being sent HIS way, I doubt it. That
would mean someone had inadvertently mistaken me for a nice guy.

"Not that Jim" .............. sounds good to me. Since you're
apparently the spokesman for "we're all" maybe you should tell him
that everyone wants him to change it.