Re: NX591Egsm

["Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>"we're all"

A regional idiom or bromide, perhaps a variant of "you all" and not to be
taken literally.

"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1189829596.565274.215450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Sep 14, 6:05?pm, "Just Looking" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >rather than wanting to be confused with me.
>>
>> Well after you post a long Bass rant we're all a little confused with
>> you.
>> Unfortunately by using the name Jim he may be mistakenly identified as
>> you
>> too. An inadvertent flame or two sent his way, instead of yours of
>> course,
>> will straighten things out for him I feel certain. Maybe he could use
>> "Not
>> that Jim" as his name?
>>
>
> You must be mistaking me for some one else. I very seldom post "long"
> Dead Ass rants. Occasionally but not often. But please, ...... DO
> identifiy who "we're all" are.
>
> And .... well .....yes, as a matter of fact I WAS concerned about him
> being mistakenly identified with me. I wouldn't want anyone else being
> given credit for telling Dead Ass to hurry up and dig his grave.
>
> As far as inadvertent flames being sent HIS way, I doubt it. That
> would mean someone had inadvertently mistaken me for a nice guy.
>
> "Not that Jim" .............. sounds good to me. Since you're
> apparently the spokesman for "we're all" maybe you should tell him
> that everyone wants him to change it.
>