[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request

Subject: Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:44:48 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <7c012229bc96ce98242f6b74b90eff26@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46f2d0bb$0$19620$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46f2d0bb$0$19620$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Well if we all want to preach how poor customers get screwed with Brinks,
> then I think most everyone here should be singing a different tune. Most
> here are, or simply should be,  in love with Brinks and their business
> practices. How many times has anyone gone to a Brinks job and found
anything
> other than generally substandard workmanship,

Brinks is huge around here and I have seen countless excellent installations
by them, can't stand their panels but the installs are very good

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
  - From: Robert L Bass

References:
- Brinks v Rojas Update Request
  - From: Anonymous
- Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
  - From: Just Looking

Prev by Message: Re: FBII XL2T Help
Next by Message: Re: Generic Central Station Horror Tales
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
Next by thread: Re: Brinks v Rojas Update Request
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home