Re: LOCKED PANEL

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Anonymous Sender" <anonymous@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:11c595a69e8fc2f663d0fc314fe173aa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> alt.security.alarms
> Re: LOCKED PANEL
>
> Brinks installs their system. The customer then agrees to pay the $500
> to own it. The customer cancels Brinks after completeing the contract.
> Guess what? Brinks will not service the system the customer owns unless
> they resign another 3 year contract. Since the panel is not keypad
> programmable, it is the same as locking the panel out even though the
> customer owns the equipment. There lies the problem. The customer has
> been ripped off.
>
> Angry Man In Gauteng

I don't see how, just because the customer buys the equipment doesn't mean
Brinks is obligated in any way to service it without a contract