Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I can't believe you're still wanting another bite at this. I have given you
every sane reason to look at the crap in your own shorts and get rid of it
behind the bushes modestly before you spread it all over the place. Well how
about this. If you really want to know the details ask the president of your
company. He knows. Why does he know? As you can imagine, he okayed the deal.
If you don't know just how to ask him about the details start with "hey
boss, did we screw up big time and have to pay off a dealer a few weeks back
so he and the customer wouldn't file suit against us?" Hopefully it is not
so frequent an event he doesn't reply "which screw up was that?" Maybe you
should ask him if it is a good idea to have details about stuff like that
posted here for all to read about. Get back with me ASAP and let me know
what the president of your company says about it. I suspect the business
model at your company is to charge for a service, not to pay a dealer for
services that were not provided; but in seeing your lack of tact about this
I see I could be wrong. But nevertheless, somehow the latter occurred
despite your persistent disbelief. If you want to pretend it didn't happen
that is your business. If you really want me to make it public I will.
Perhaps a letter to your boss mentioning your name would be helpful in
getting the proper okays from him for posting it all here?
What do you think? Why are you acting like Homer Simpson chasing a doughnut
over a cliff? Are you so full of yourself that you believe this might not of
happened, and simply refuse to check for yourself; and yet still shoot your
mouth off about it.?? After you really actually check it out I believe crow
should be the only menu item for you for a good long while. Crow is better
when you don't try to wash it down with so much Kool-Aid.

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46dde09e$0$18956$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:46c87ad2$0$16521$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Since I post on more than one computer in more than one location, using
> > another name helps me to know which is which. I never thought anyone
would
> > think I was trying to obfuscate my identity or much less care for that
> > matter.
> >
> > >> I heard some pretty pathetic things about Just Looking
> >
> > If it is more than just about me being fat and lazy I think he should
> share
> > that information. Things can get a little too dull here sometimes.
Putting
> > out a new batch of BS might make for some interesting reading.
> > I think you won't hear too much more about this screw up from him. Since
> he
> > can't effectively deny it anymore, for him there is nothing more to
gain.
> He
> > knows he can only make it worse, especially if someone up the food chain
> > finds his name associated with this dirty laundry. It might end up
getting
> > him a very long vacation, even if he is the "go to" guy in tech support
> and
> > thinks no one would put the smoldering boot print on his ass. The more
he
> > stirs this, the worse it going to smell. If what he says is really true
> that
> > no one he works for is telling him not to talk about this, it might be
> > interesting to see if someone has figured out a way for this type of
thing
> > not to happen again. That would make for an interesting constructive
post
> > for everyone to read and learn from. Although I posted some highlights
> about
> > an event (that didn't really happed) it is actually much worse and many
> > details were, let us say, not covered. If anyone wants to know more I
> > suggest asking LIKE about the details. Remember he posted that no one
told
> > him he couldn't talk about it. Funny, it sure is quiet now.
>
> I'm sure it was quiet since I've been on vacation for the last 2 weeks and
> since you again didn't go into much detail in spite of a lengthy
> explaination there isn't much to comment on anyway, people can ask LIKE
> about all the details they want although it appears you are the only one
> here who seems to know what they are
>
>