Re: What is Brinks worried about?

["Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>Sableman should be contacting the Hosting
>Provider for http://www.comseccorp.com immediately.

I don't think he would. Communications Security Corp probably has real
attorneys on staff and would actually not give him a chance to win by
default, or not win at all. Lawyers hate that almost as much as not getting
paid. Besides they've been around since 2003, certainly enough time by now
to have crossed swords with Brinks.

"Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d2qTi.130513$1y4.87345@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jim Rojas wrote:
> > This for starters...
> >
> > http://comseccorp.com/_wsn/page2.html
> >
> > Jim Rojas
>
>
> Hi Jim:
>
> Would you know if Brinks would still be able to download their panel
> with this "re-router" attached?  If not, this unit itself would present
> the biggest threat to their revenue stream.  Does this mean that
> companies like Brinks and ADT are going to go after any DIY store that
> offers this unit for sale?  Not only does this unit offer the clear
> capability to "tortuously interfere" with *any* existing monitoring
> contract, it also provides the customer that purchases a home with
> existing equipment installed to have it monitored without even having to
> contact Brinks.  Yep...  Sableman should be contacting the Hosting
> Provider for http://www.comseccorp.com immediately.