Re: What's a Brinks 4000?

[Frank Olson <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> I am sending letters to all Thompson Coburn offices in the USA just to
>> make sure that each office is fully aware what this jerk is up to.
>
> Just what is it that you think Sableman is doing that is so wrong?
>
> He's a lawyer, and he's getting paid money to represent Brink's.  He isn't
> getting paid to be a judge.  He sure isn't getting paid to represent you.
> If he took money from Brink's and didn't do his best to nail your ass to
> the wall, he'd be a crook for taking money and not doing his job.  He has
> an ethical obligation to do the best job he can of representing his client.
>
> You are supposed to have an attorney who is equally dedicated to
> representing your interests.  You would be upset if you were paying your
> lawyer lots of money and he started sounding like he was representing the
> other side.  Your lawyer has a duty to do his best for you, just as
> Sableman has a duty to do his best for Brink's.  It isn't personal.  For
> whatever reason, you don't have a lawyer.  That's not Sableman's fault.
>
> Getting pissed off at Sableman is like climbing into the ring with a
> professional boxer, and then getting pissed off because he beats  your ass.
> That's his job.  If you think he's hitting below the belt, that's different
> -- tell us why.  Otherwise, your letter to the other offices will probably
> only be taken as an indication that he's doing a good job.  Why would they
> object to him winning a case for a client?
>


You obviously haven't been reading "the case" put forward by Mr.
Sableman.  The guy's a jerk, doesn't understand that knowing the default
installer code for a panel *isn't* "a hack", and lies like Robert Bass.