Re: What's a Brinks 4000?

[Nomen Nescio <nobody@xxxxxxxxx>]

>I am sending letters to all Thompson Coburn offices in the USA just to
>make sure that each office is fully aware what this jerk is up to.

Just what is it that you think Sableman is doing that is so wrong?

He's a lawyer, and he's getting paid money to represent Brink's.  He isn't
getting paid to be a judge.  He sure isn't getting paid to represent you.
If he took money from Brink's and didn't do his best to nail your ass to
the wall, he'd be a crook for taking money and not doing his job.  He has
an ethical obligation to do the best job he can of representing his client.

You are supposed to have an attorney who is equally dedicated to
representing your interests.  You would be upset if you were paying your
lawyer lots of money and he started sounding like he was representing the
other side.  Your lawyer has a duty to do his best for you, just as
Sableman has a duty to do his best for Brink's.  It isn't personal.  For
whatever reason, you don't have a lawyer.  That's not Sableman's fault.

Getting pissed off at Sableman is like climbing into the ring with a
professional boxer, and then getting pissed off because he beats  your ass.
That's his job.  If you think he's hitting below the belt, that's different
-- tell us why.  Otherwise, your letter to the other offices will probably
only be taken as an indication that he's doing a good job.  Why would they
object to him winning a case for a client?