Re: Tech-Man going to Texas?

["Roland Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

You're really something! First, all this was just a figment of my
imagination and it never happened according to you. You didn't know what did
happen, but you were certain about what didn't happen You were describing
this fiasco as just an unbelievable medically induced sensational story I
cooked up at Monitronics expense. You claimed to not have ever know Trixie,
and now you're talking to her on the phone? Wow, you should have thrown up a
flare for folks to catch the scene surrounding that revelation. Did you
catch up on old times or what? Do the meds make that amnesia come and go
like that? If you look at the other posts all this information you claim you
needed was in there in the first place, you just had to think a little to
see it. Seems that activity is not in your job description. Next you claim
to not know anyone involved on the one hand, and then trained everyone
involved on the other. That's pretty confusing, so which is it? So now that
it has all turned to crap, no one working there did anything wrong, and yet
it's still Monitronics fault? Give me a break! No "Hush money" involved?
Okay now we're down to semantics? If someone gives you money to settle a
problem rather than suffer its escalation by more disclosure then I must
stand corrected. For clarification you'll just have to fill in the euphemism
you like best. For me "hush money" works just fine to describe the
situation. And why would I suspect you knew anything about it? Well if you
are who you claim to be, and in the lofty position you claim to have, (when
your memory kicks in that is) then it is a natural assumption on my part.
Additionally, most organizations that suffer a loss of this type deconstruct
it step by step to avoid a repeat. Everyone involved, however peripherally,
gets informed. This was represented by Monitronics as more than just an
error by a single individual or small group, this was someone carrying out a
policy. If it is a policy it is written down somewhere, don't you think? I
suppose you have read the policy? After reading the policy a bomb did go off
in your head pointing to an event like the one that occurred? Someone or
some group made that policy at some certain date. Just who was that person,
and when did it happen? How many times has a loss like this happened before
that can be traced back to this policy? I am very curious about that
person's identity that wrote this policy, and to me it's funny that you're
not. Or was someone not telling the truth about that as well? Unless someone
gets fired for misconduct, I guess it really is policy. You don't seem to
have the least concern over that policy, and the fact that it could lead to
this same thing happening again and again. But as usual this is all about
you, CYA, I know nothing, I didn't do it, and I don't know the folks
involved. And you have the nerve to suggest I am on meds? As I have said
before, you're simply not credible. For you so far it has come out just fine
for you in your eyes it seems. That is Monitronics has paid the bill and you
have not had to accept even a tiny portion of responsibility. You future on
the cover of MAD magazine is still secure.

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47111b3b$0$7445$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Roland Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:47106efe$0$24320$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Note to all dealers. Mark Leuck here claims to be the apex of the
> > Monitronics organization. He trains these guys so much that they can't
> seem
> > to find the time to download a panel in less than 6 months or so.
>
> I don't claim anything, I leave that to you
>
>
> > ...........Rodriguez Mini Mart located @
> >
> > 1428 Nogalitos San Antonio, Texas 78204
> >
> > Account # SO-052275
> >
> > Back up cell account# AN0814
> >
> > Dealer 4293 Security Contractors Inc.
>
> Hey he finally gives specific information! Had you done that from the
> beginning things might have been different
>
> > Steve in Dealer Tech Support Special Projects was asked to do this by
> > Tracy...............
> >
> > And guess what? Monitronics paid up.
>
> If it was Monitronics fault then I'm sure they did, you still haven't
> answered the other question like how I would know all this and you also
made
> the baseless accusation that I would have been covering it all up
>
> > Hey Mark, has your paycheck been a
> > little short since then?
>
> Actually no, it doesn't quite work that way
>
> > I hope not! But maybe your time on the job could
> > be, now that you have finally forced this into the open. Good job. Be
> proud
> > of yourself!
>
> If you remember you brought it all up over a month ago
>
> > Please don't forget folks that if you need a second source to
> > verify all this call Tracy. After all her years there at Monitronics I
bet
> > she could tell you even more stories much worse than this. And to think,
> for
> > some reason poor Mark doesn't seem to know any of these people anymore.
>
> You might want to call her instead, if you recall you also talked about
> "hush money" which she said never happened
>
>