Re: Brinks Copyright Documents

["Roland Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>]

It seems to me that this is a completed form showing who is temporarily
authorized to be the person to contact or be contacted for claimed
infringement issues. Seems like the person listed is a lawyer that got her
JD in 1999 and lives in Irving, Texas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OCILLA#Notification_of_claimed_infringement

Notification of claimed infringement
If an infringement has occurred a copyright holder may send a written
notification of claimed infringement to the designated agent. This must
include the following (512(c)(3)(A)(i-vi)):

(i) A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on
behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
(ii) Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed,
or, if multiple copyrighted works at a single online site are covered by a
single notification, a representative list of such works at that site.
(iii) Identification of the material that is claimed to be infringing or to
be the subject of infringing activity and that is to be removed or access to
which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit the
service provider to locate the material.
(iv) Information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to
contact the complaining party, such as an address, telephone number, and, if
available, an electronic mail address at which the complaining party may be
contacted.
(v) A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that use
of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the
copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
(vi) A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and
under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on
behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
See 512(a) and (h) below if the information is not stored on the system of
the OSP but is instead on a system connected to the internet through it,
like a home or business computer connected to the internet. Legal liability
may result if access to material is disabled or identity disclosed in this
case.

If a notice which substantially complies with these requirements is received
the OSP must expeditiously remove or disable access to the allegedly
infringing material (512(c)(1)(C)). So long as the notice substantially
complies with clauses (ii), (iii), and (iv) the OSP must seek clarification
of any unclear aspects (512(c)(3)(B)(ii)). It is prudent to seek
clarification in all cases.

After the notice has been complied with the OSP must take reasonable steps
to promptly notify the alleged infringer of the action (512(g)(2)(A)). Note
that the OSP is not prohibited from doing so in advance, only required to do
so afterward. If there is a counter notification from the alleged infringer,
the OSP must respond appropriately to it.

If the OSP complies with this and the counter notification procedures, it is
safe from legal liability to its own customer as a result of taking down the
material.


"Jim Rojas" <jrojas+tech-man.com> wrote in message
news:471a6516$0$20560$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Does anyone know what these documents are referring to?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jim Rojas
>
>