[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion

Subject: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
From: Frank Olson <Use-the-email-links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:44:50 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <470BFCC8.4080809@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <sL1Pi.8610$Da.1211@pd7urf1no> <470cd9ca$0$18986$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <705Pi.8402$th2.930@pd7urf3no> <5n4a1bFg2nilU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Bill wrote:
>> I take it that all the claims and motions posted on your site are
>> considered "public record" since they're filed in a Court of Law.
>>
>
> Hummm.... So if something "copyrighted" or "proprietary" was included in a
> court motion or claim, would it then become public record?
>
>


Yes, it certainly would.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: CWatters

References:
- Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
  - From: Bill

Prev by Message: Re: What's a Brinks 4000?
Next by Message: Re: Brinks Copyright Documents
Previous by thread: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
Next by thread: Re: Brinks v Jim Rojas New Motion
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home