Re: What's a Brinks 4000?

[Jim Rojas <jrojas+tech-man.com>]

Well if thats the case, why should I bother going to Dallas?

I'll send a letter to the Judge stating thanks but no thanks. I'll take
the grandkids to Busch Gardens instead.

There is no point showing up if the outcome will be the same.

Jim Rojas



Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> It would really help if Crash would send you the original.  Sableman's
>> way to sharp to let you submit a printout from a file sharing website.
>> Heck...  if you could get your mitts on a blank form, you'd blow him out
>> of the water.
>
> You guys don't understand.  The facts of this case no longer matter.  When
> Jim failed to file a timely answer to the lawsuit, and was unable to
> convince the judge to allow him to file late, all of the factual
> allegations in Brinks' complaint automatically became true:  Jim is
> considered to have admitted them.  Brink's no longer has to prove them.
>
> Jim is left with a technical legal argument: that a Texas court shouldn't
> have the authority to enter a judgment against him.  He needs a lawyer to
> make that argument for him.
>