[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re:



> Consider this, will the elect. inspector regard this as violating the UL
listing of the control?

No.
The UL listing only applies to the panel, not the installation. A UL listed
company does UL listed installation when it is required. UL listed alarm
systems are a different world, and a world that is a giant pain and expense.
Very few companies do UL installations since so few are called for. Jewelry
stores, gun stores or other high value merchandise venues can require it. In
the end you pay all to the insurance company, or you pay half to the alarm
company and half to the insurance company. Either way there is not much
difference to the end user's pocketbook for having a UL listed system. At
least that is what I hear from the customers on those type of installations.
I haven't done one in years and years and don't look forward to doing any
either. I especially don't miss drilling concrete, beating in the ground
rods, and pumping ten ton floor jacks for installing the hockey puck
insulators on the proximity alarms. Those were the bad old days having to
protect all 6 sides of a safe. Then installing the dreaded balanced contacts
without making any new holes in the safe. It's nasty work. I am glad someone
else is doing it.


<awstoltenberg@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1194754444.783964.223460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On ,  wrote:
> > Phone connections
> > Do you like them inside the panel locked up. Or out side where the
customer
> > can unplug the phone line from the alarm panel?
>
> Consider this, will the elect. inspector regard this as violating the
> UL listing of the control?
>




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home