Re:

[Frank Olson <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Robert L Bass wrote:
>
> <awstoltenberg@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1194754444.783964.223460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On ,  wrote:
>>> Phone connections
>>> Do you like them inside the panel locked up. Or out side where the
>>> customer
>>> can unplug the phone line from the alarm panel?
>>
>> Consider this, will the elect. inspector regard this as violating the
>> UL listing of the control?
>
> It depends on whom you ask.  Olson will tell you that since the burglar
> alarm isn't a listed FACP the entire system is not a fire alarm and is
> therefore exempt from any and all codes, including FAA regs regarding
> inverted flight.
>

It's perfectly acceptable to mount a panel inverted.  You just can't fly
one that way because it doesn't have a C of A (Certificate of
Airworthiness).  Come to think of it, you can't use one as a boat anchor
either because it's not Coast Guard approved.