Re: Notice To Brinks

[Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, I can't reply to this thread. According to Brinks testimony to
the Court, Nomen Nescio is actually is Jim Rojas. This now makes it
legal fact, since the Court decided to stick their head in the sand.

Jim Rojas
Sock puppet for Jim Rojas



datalines@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Nov 1, 6:50 am, Nomen Nescio <nob...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It clearly contains all the Brinks trade secrets. It shows how one million plus subscribers can be suckered into signing up for their inferior monitoring service, substandard equipment, and lets not forget their bare minimum level of protected openings.
>>
>> Gus
>>
>> Can you please tell us exactly IP and trade secrets you are refferring to?
>> We have about a thousand years cumulative experience in this group and none
>> of us can find what you claiming to the court.
>>
>> Bob La Londe
>> I am not a sock puppet
>>
>> --
>> Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com
>
> Brinks Security Systems are for city slickers who don't know how to
> use guns
> to protect their homes.   An armed criminal comes into someone's
> house  within
> a few minutes,  so the alarm goes off and the cops come to the house
> in 10-15 minutes.
> So by greater force of logic,  what is going to happen?   Duh???
>

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com