[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Snitch Rat



Sounds fishy to me too.


"Just Looking" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:463b9ea2$0$18853$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| That was my plan once it is all working. It is too much of a 'the dog ate
my
| homework' or 'aliens landed in the back yard' type of thing to bring up
| without someone thinking you're wearing the tinfoil cap. I have seen many
| efforts at defeating a system, but never by the installer himself.
|
| "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:463b5578$0$505$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Inform the client - no matter how many letters they have in their name
:-)
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
| > "Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:463b40f1$0$5654$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | So I had to replace an old DS 7400 Xi with a 9412GV2. The regular crew
| was
| > a
| > | little confused so I went to take a sniff for myself. The panel was
full
| > of
| > | mux devices like a DS7432 and MX938. No big deal. Get a 8125MUX and a
| > D5060
| > | and go to town. So when going through the spaghetti I was stumped. It
| made
| > | no sense. Finally I realized that someone had landed the MX 938 MUX
| > devices
| > | on the DS7432 analog zone expander. The loop voltage from the DS7432
| gave
| > | the appearance that the MX938 was working (since the LED came on).
Even
| > | worse they "documented" this error in hand written as well as typed
form
| > and
| > | left on the job. Okay then! Why were some MX938 devices wired and
| > programmed
| > | correctly and others done incorrectly when it was installed at the
same
| > time
| > | by the same person (judging from the hand writing)? Stupid? Careless?
| > | Sabotage? This is a place where security is critical. The work was of
| > course
| > | originally done and later blessed by the big three letter company that
| > | starts with A. Does that company have any internal discipline staff or
| QC
| > | that should be notified? Or should I be a snitch rat and turn the
| > documents
| > | over to law enforcement as fraud. If this weren't the type of facility
| it
| > is
| > | I know that type of complaint would generally go nowhere. But this
place
| > is
| > | the type with the profile and (full time federally paid three letter)
| > legal
| > | clout to cause serious trouble for someone, even ones with a fat three
| > | letter wallet, especially with the handwritten documents left behind.
I
| am
| > | sure that the three letter company doesn't want to see these other
three
| > | letter boys showing up on their doorstep. I believe I just saw
stupidity
| > in
| > | action, but it could be an effort of a crime as well. I am puzzled.
Has
| > | anyone here ever had experience with the pooper scooper going behind
| these
| > | companies and cleaning up their messes? Is this typical? I hope not. I
| > have
| > | seen lots of stuff that is pure crap as an installation but never
| > something
| > | exactly like this where it seems that a path of disabled devices is
| being
| > | created right under someone's nose, but made to look as if they
| functioned
| > | correctly. I am being too paranoid or not paranoid enough?
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|




alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home