Re: Recommendation on replacement for MA1016e panel

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Jul 30, 11:05?pm, "Mark Leuck" <m..le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Jim" <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:1185848986.579738.82150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> > > > Check your facts before you ask about what I know and don't know.
>
> > > I uh did-
>
> > You, like him, didn't check far enough. He recommened what he
> > remembered from 5 years ago. He didn't recommend a newer product that
> > is more capable and less expensive.
> > And THAT's the accessory number he
> > doesn't know .
>
> So the problem here is he didn't recommend the product that you wanted him
> to recommend?
>
> > Now it becomes more obvious that you, like him, don't
> > know what the fuck your talking about either and now you're proving
> > that you're too stupid to find out.
>
> One of us is stupid and its not me

Nah that's not the problem Mark.

I know you're a little dim witted but your aware enough to know the
point I'm trying to make. But..... I'll go over it for you so you'll
know better the next time.

I'm sure you wouldn't recommend that someone use a 15 year old product
to a customer, if a better, less expensive product were
available ..... unless you didn't know that the product existed. If
you were actually active in the trade, and professed to be and expert
on that product line and didn't know that there was a newer product
out for over a year and a half, that would take away from the fact
that you were and "expert" and that you were "in the trade" .......
GET IT?

So you see ......the problem is .... thay you'd create an argument
between two saints ... just for the hell of it.

You're a fucking obtuse asshole and that about explains it all.