Re: Brinks Attorney Information Part 3

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Jul 26, 4:42?pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jim, please listen to those who tell you correctly this is NOT the
> right approach. Even though I too think that Brinks are in the same
> bottom feeding group as some of the other large mass marketers,
> putting this kind of information out on the newsgroup can't assist the
> situation, and might even hurt you personally. Their opportunistic
> lawyers will use anything and everything they can to build their case,
> regardless of the true facts of the situation. Having met you once,
> and having dealt with you over the years in regards to our mutual
> board unlocking enterprise, I know you are an honourable person, and I
> consider you a friend. And I know this whole mess is an unfair burden
> on you relative to any perceived damage to Brink's already piss poor
> reputation. But PLEASE don't make things worse for yourself.
>
> I really want to get out on that boat of yours as you've been
> promising me for years ! If you're not real careful, you may not have
> a boat to go out on.  You have friends on this newsgroup (real and
> virtual) who care what happens to you. I count myself as one of
> them....
>
> RHC
>


DUH

BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!

Quote: "Having met you once, and having dealt with you over the years
in regards to our mutual board unlocking enterprise, I know you are an
honourable person, and I consider you a friend."


Jeeeeeeze!!!!!!!