Re: Brinks Attorney Information Part 3

["Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Are you pointing out that playing DIY lawyer may prove to many that you can
get a colonoscopy in the courtroom?

"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1185751963.131521.47480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Jul 26, 4:42?pm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Jim, please listen to those who tell you correctly this is NOT the
>> right approach. Even though I too think that Brinks are in the same
>> bottom feeding group as some of the other large mass marketers,
>> putting this kind of information out on the newsgroup can't assist the
>> situation, and might even hurt you personally. Their opportunistic
>> lawyers will use anything and everything they can to build their case,
>> regardless of the true facts of the situation. Having met you once,
>> and having dealt with you over the years in regards to our mutual
>> board unlocking enterprise, I know you are an honourable person, and I
>> consider you a friend. And I know this whole mess is an unfair burden
>> on you relative to any perceived damage to Brink's already piss poor
>> reputation. But PLEASE don't make things worse for yourself.
>>
>> I really want to get out on that boat of yours as you've been
>> promising me for years ! If you're not real careful, you may not have
>> a boat to go out on.  You have friends on this newsgroup (real and
>> virtual) who care what happens to you. I count myself as one of
>> them....
>>
>> RHC
>>
>
>
> DUH
>
> BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!
>
> Quote: "Having met you once, and having dealt with you over the years
> in regards to our mutual board unlocking enterprise, I know you are an
> honourable person, and I consider you a friend."
>
>
> Jeeeeeeze!!!!!!!
>