[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Testing Popits

Subject: Re: Testing Popits
From: Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 09:34:35 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1183752900.513859.87840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <468f8c49$0$20577$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1183818834.844451.221980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46926684$0$8012$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46953d25$0$10301$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46955217$0$3100$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <uVFli.7361$CJ4.5748@trndny08>

On Jul 13, 2:33 am, "Robert L Bass" <RobertLB...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > That's when you find that installer and hang
> > him with a few twists of the data run right
> > from that same spot; and leave his mummified
> > pelt there as a warning for the next installer
> > not to do that...
>
> Rocket science at its finest...  :^)
>

A comment proving you to be the perfect asshole.


> --
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass
>

References:
- Testing Popits
  - From: T.J.
- Re: Testing Popits
  - From: Roland More
- Re: Testing Popits
  - From: T.J.
- Re: Testing Popits
  - From: Just Looking
- Re: Testing Popits
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Testing Popits
  - From: Just Looking
- Re: Testing Popits
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Major shortcoming in Paradox new panel lineup
Next by Message: Re: Panasonic KXTD
Previous by thread: Re: Testing Popits
Next by thread: Vista 50P ADT
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home