Re: No Serial Ports on Notebooks

[Jim Rojas <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wow...what torture. I have Ram 2 running on a Pentium 3 laptop with Win98se.

Jim Rojas



Crash Gordon wrote:
> thats why i still have a 486 running dos...so i can still RAM old radx
> stuff.
>
>
>
> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:468af79a$0$20555$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |
> | "The Computer Dood" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | news:ZLAii.470827$JN6.385673@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |
> | > I have had the same problem, but with Desktops.  You are correct, that
> | > the hardware emulation does not always do the trick...but what does that
> | > say for us hanging on to "OLD" software.  In my Software Engineering
> | > classes, we talked about "Life Cycle" of software.  How long should it
> | > be maintained, and how long should it run before it is rightfully
> | > retired.
> |
> | It's not a question of retiring, sometimes you have no choice especially
> | with discontinued panels like Linear CP-90's, AT&T and old Caddx panels,
> | that software is DOS only
> |
> |
> | I guess the moral is that they built stuff too good back then.
> | >   What is it you are using that uses DOS anymore?  I used to program
> | > industrial devices with RS-232 controls, back in the early 1980's.  So
> | > here we are 20 years later, still clinging to RS232 devices?  Now I buy
> | > networked (TCP/IP) devices.  The speed difference (156K vs 10Mb) between
> | > network devices and RS232 Serial is astronomical.  So what is it you are
> | > using DOS for????????????  It is not even "DOS" anymore, but the command
> | > shell.
> |
> | Security system technology still resides somewhere in the 80's
> |
> |
>
>