Re: Napco 2600 question

["Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

A 2600 is modern? Didn't Cain use that to kill Able? That thing was around
before the MA3000.

"Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:45cca04b$0$504$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jeeez I thought all modern panels did instant.
>
>
> "Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:45cc8ee1$0$16350$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | news:45cbb28a$0$1390$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > "West Alarm" <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | > news:j0ils29u8unancpupf0n4n6gfuu5f19ju9@xxxxxxxxxx
> | >> On 7 Feb 2007 16:24:57 -0800, "Atomb" <atomb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> | >>
> | >> >So every time I arm the system  there will be a 30 second delay.
> Will
> | >> >ademco instantly arm (no delay)
> | >> >
> | >> >
> | >>
> | >>
> | >> I've had issue with this before, the short answer is 'no'.
> | >>
> | >> It will work for zones programmed as 'peri', but not your peri delay
> | >> zones (and of course not the int zones).  The reason I guess is
> | >> because some users will want to instant arm (going on long vactions)
> | >> and still get out of the house.
> | >
> | > That is exactly the reason, you still haven't mentioned why you want
> to
> do
> | > this?
> |
> |
> | I don't know about his particular client, but I have had tons of clients
> who
> | would like to instant arm when they go to bed at night.  Napco (my
> preferred
> | panel line) does not do this.  The old FBII XL series panels did.  From
> the
> | end user perspective they were one of the easiest panels to use.  Sadly
> the
> | got eaten by the borg and stopped evolving.
> |
> | With an FBII XL panel you hit stay or instant and stay before arming.
> Stay
> | bypassed interior zones, and instant cancelled entry and exit delays.
> |
> |
> |
> | --
> | Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> |
>
>