[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: DSC 864 or 1864

Subject: Re: DSC 864 or 1864
From: "Barney" <spam@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:15:47 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1170744088.154732.270980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Xg1yh.28773$u92.16514@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

"alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xg1yh.28773$u92.16514@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What's wrong with your 832?
> js
I'm with you, if it ain't broke don't fix it.

References:
- DSC 864 or 1864
  - From: bigjess007
- Re: DSC 864 or 1864
  - From: alarman

Prev by Message: The Rise of Physical Security Information Management (E-Commerce Times)
Next by Message: Re: DSC 864 or 1864
Previous by thread: Re: DSC 864 or 1864
Next by thread: Re: DSC 864 or 1864
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home