Re: Stupid question

[JoeRaisin <joeraisin@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

JohnO wrote:
> "Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:w_h5j.5722$XA6.140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> I'm assuming that you realise that "NO sensors" means Normally Open
>> sensors, not "no sensors" as in none, nada, zero, zip etc.
>>
>
> LOL, whoops. I hope this doesn't mean I gotta tell my kids that NO does not
> mean no. :-)
>
> Thanks.
>
> -John O
>
>

I been playing with these things for six years now and you know I read
it that way the first time too.  Just assumed they were being emphatic
about the lack of sensors.

But then none of the answers made sense so I figured I got the question
wrong and read it again - bingo.  One of the 'test taking tips' I've
picked up over the years - if the answers are confusing, figure out
exactly what the question is asking.