Re: New Simon 3 erratic behavior

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On Dec 3, 3:42=EF=BF=BDpm, tourman <robercampb...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Dec 2, 10:51 am, "Crash Gordon" <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > I've recently taken to recinding my discount certificates if people canc=
el
> > monitoring...never used to, but I figure they shouldn't get that additio=
nal
> > disc. if they are not monitored.
>
> > --
> > **Crash Gordon**
>
> RHC: I'm totally confused by your post Crash. If it's not monitored,
> why would there be any sort of discount applicable at all, so why
> would you have to "rescind" anything.
>
> I've never heard of any insurance company giving any sort of insurance
> discount for a non-monitored system (In my neck of the woods, once the
> system is no longer monitored, any companies that I know of want
> nothing to do with it whatsoever, including servicing it). And
> really, =EF=BF=BDwhy would any insurance company extend any sort of discou=
nt
> since the system is virtually useless unless you have professional
> response of some sort to an alarm !!!!
>
> Is it different in your part of the world ?

I think it's been mentioned here that *some* insurance companys offer
a smaller discount if the system isn't monitored. I've never heard of
it here in my area.