[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: It never fails

Subject: Re: It never fails
From: "Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 19:01:54 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <4c2a2fde-627b-4abe-8c15-2debbd695a4f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <95b692cb-66ce-4043-91b2-13f8757fa5c8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1c346fc9-8998-478d-b801-c13d2c85856c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0d949651-82eb-467e-99d6-a02ed0000293@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2bC4j.65$db7.58@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <LOD4j.16446$UQ1.12191@pd7urf1no> <WVD4j.71$db7.67@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <6ae87864-87f5-4b85-a9b3-3ec77d0b8797@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <oJG4j.79$db7.49@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <EeJ4j.19324$UQ1.781@pd7urf1no>

Not exactly

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=stamp+licker

Doug

--

"Matt Ion" <soundy106@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EeJ4j.19324$UQ1.781@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Doug wrote:
>> I'm just wondering how long it will be until someone introduces the slang
>> definition for "stamp licker" into the thread
>
> Would it be synonymous with "dog fucker"?

References:
- It never fails
  - From: allucan8
- Re: It never fails
  - From: tourman
- Re: It never fails
  - From: allucan8
- Re: It never fails
  - From: tourman
- Re: It never fails
  - From: Doug
- Re: It never fails
  - From: Matt Ion
- Re: It never fails
  - From: Doug
- Re: It never fails
  - From: tourman
- Re: It never fails
  - From: Doug
- Re: It never fails
  - From: Matt Ion

Prev by Message: Re: A tough one to break into!
Next by Message: Re: A tough one to break into!
Previous by thread: Re: It never fails
Next by thread: Re: It never fails
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home