Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I suspect you're right. I can only hear the crickets now. And just remember,
wasn't I the one that was supposed to be full of it on this story? Still, it
would be nice for a certain large central station (imaginary or not) to
present a reasoned, well thought out plan to avoid a problem like this in
the future. I am sure many other besides me would like to see that post
here.

"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:970107149c3c761dc8f10f717ccdab79@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Roland More said:
>
>>Feel free to connect the dots anyway you like. I won't confirm or deny
>>your
>>connections. I don't feel like walking in Jim Rojas' shoes with the Brinks
>>monster. Being right or reasonable isn't going to save the wallet from the
>>legal cashectomy resulting from telling the truth. I have been to Federal
>>Court. The only attorneys I feel comfortable going with back in that
>>dangerous place have a 25K minimum retainer fee. I have not identified
>>anyone or any company specifically here. However some company might take
>>particular exception and start taking the legal bluster route. I don't
>>believe that would serve anyone's interests. It might be interesting to
>>see
>>if there are any other posts saying it ain't so. I doubt there will be,
>>but
>>if there are maybe then some FedEx tracking numbers would come in handy?
>>If
>>not, I still have the names, dates, times, places and faces. I don't have
>>an
>>agenda to try and besmirch any person or company. However what happened
>>did
>>happen. Trying to pretend I am full of it isn't going to help anyone truly
>>trying to address a problem like this. No one should rejoice at any of
>>this.
>>It is bad for everyone involved and for the industry as a whole.
>
> If you can prove your statements, I don't think you have to worry about
> this hypothetical, unnamed alarm company suing you.  That would only
> result
> in all this becoming public knowledge.  I'm guessing the very last thing
> this hypothetical alarm company would want is publicity.  If what you say
> is true, and can be proved, they will shut up and hope this goes away.
>
> - badenov
>
>
>
>
>
>