Re: Notifier

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

alarmlife shouldn't be so complicated



"Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1175571562.888840.143390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| On Mar 31, 9:07?am, "Crash Gordon" <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| wrote:
| > Sheesh..dunno what freekin catagory I'd fit into...Radx, DMP AND
Ademco...an
| > elite trunkslammer I guess??
| > I gotta go make an appointment for therapy now.
| > At least I don't do Napco.
| >
|
| Well I guess we all can only aspire to attaining a certain high level
| in product quality and capability. ;->
|
| I've been using them for so long now, it's really hard for me to see
| what all the negativity about them is about. 25/30 years ago, their
| method of programing was really very logical and worked well for the
| simple panels back then. What could be simpler then counting in
| binary? They just didn't project how that style of programing was
| going to get so cumbersome as the panel options reached into the
| hundreds.  And they also underestimated how many would take so long
| just to figure out how to open a laptop, much less use one.
|
| I think other than the fact that they're almost bullet proof (1632 on
| up) it' s not that one will regularly use all the functions and
| capabilities of the panels, it's just such a confidence thing knowing
| that no matter what the client asks for or ever ..... asks for, you
| can do it.
|
| I will say one thing. Once you learn how to program a Napco panel, all
| the others are like baby talk. It's only a matter of learning the
| mfg's jargon.
|