[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: ADT alarm

Subject: Re: ADT alarm
From: Bif <sample@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2006 08:46:18 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1160592259.037171.159440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fMhXg.10267$o71.1070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <rPednToW5vhnQLDYnZ2dnUVZ_rGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Robert L Bass wrote:


> That argument assumes that monitoring service will actually deter the thief or enable the homeowner to obtain police, fire or
> medical response in a timely manner.  In many instances that is indeed the case, but not always.  Some rural homes are so far from
> police patrols that might not help with burglary.  Even in some densely populated cities, police response to alarm calls is so poor
> that the value of the service is questionable.


BLASPHEME

References:
- ADT alarm
  - From: sidhu1
- Re: ADT alarm
  - From: Russell Brill
- Re: ADT alarm
  - From: Robert L Bass

Prev by Message: Re: Hey Bass
Next by Message: Re: GV250 advice?
Previous by thread: Re: ADT alarm
Next by thread: Re: ADT alarm
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home