[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Law Suit in NJ

Subject: Re: Law Suit in NJ
From: "Everywhere Man" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx>
Date: 10 Nov 2006 08:30:29 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1163133452.522950.259480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <5d8c9a4d487f8e7d5d333218effcc1f6@xxxxxxxxx> <1163142517.783044.220140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <UG%4h.2527$hM5.881@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Doug wrote:
> If you really believe in what you are saying, why not remove the limitation
> of liability clauses from your contracts <

I keep it in affect so when I take that fucking 9 iron to the temple of
you old bastards your survivor's won't wind up with my tank tops,
barcalounger and remote control.

References:
- Re: Law Suit in NJ
  - From: Everywhere Man
- Re: Law Suit in NJ
  - From: Nomen Nescio
- Re: Law Suit in NJ
  - From: Everywhere Man
- Re: Law Suit in NJ
  - From: Doug

Prev by Message: Re: Law Suit in NJ
Next by Message: Re: Let's say I break into your house 9, was: Good news for US -- Secure Fence Act of 2006
Previous by thread: Re: Law Suit in NJ
Next by thread: Re: Law Suit in NJ
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home