Re: Can a Napco system & DSL connection co-exist?

["petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

and you know what there is another benefit to this....

your customer can connect his dsl modem ANYWHERE in the house and it will
work..

cant say that about the OP situation..


"alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
nKVUf.119$Fo3.23@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "FIRETEK" <firetech(change-the-ch-to-k)@telus.net> wrote in message
> news:zGVUf.3226$Ph4.190@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> Splitting hairs even further, why take the chance on a single phone line
> for
>> your alarm system?  "Seems like a no brainer" to include cellular or
>> wireless backup for every installation but how often is it done?  Mr.
>> Bass
>> was correct in his response.  In reviewing the OP's diagram (however
>> crude
>> it was), you don't need a filter for the alarm panel to communicate with
> the
>> monitoring facility.
>>
>> Don't get me wrong, I'm not taking sides here.  I agree with "Petem" that
>> there is a risk (however small) of a problem developing in the DSL line
> and
>> that the correct way to wire any single line communicator would be to use
>> the Excelsus Filter to eliminate even that small chance.
>>
>> Before this particular filter was on the market, the only way to ensure
>> uniterrupted DSL and alarm communication was to wire the PROT exactly as
> the
>> OP describes.  I'm certain there are still many installations out there
> that
>> retain this type of wired connection.  What are you (the industry) doing
> to
>> address these?
>
> Frank:
> I can't speak for the industry, but I homerun the phone line to the alarm
> control back to the protector, wire it ahead of everything else, and use
> the
> Excelsus filter if the customer has DSL. No muss, no fuss.
> js
>
>