Re: Join us in ignoring Robert L. Bass

["FIRETEK" <firetech(change-the-ch-to-k)@telus.net>]

It's clear to me that Mr. Bass understands that these posts not only clog up
server resources, they also make those of us who don't want to get involved
in the "tit for tat" business that goes on here, suffer.  Why he would elect
to continue doing so is beyond any reasonable explanation.  I would suggest
backing off entirely and not mentioning him or his business/personal issues
in the other threads.  If you were in "his shoes", I think you'd feel the
same anger and frustration he's obviously expressing at having his foibles
and character so openly discussed.

And your cat is evil.  :)

Regards,

Frank

"Frank Olson" <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:N9yWf.200007$B94.14527@xxxxxxxxxxx
> shunbass@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >  Join us in ignoring Robert L. Bass <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> >  He has:
> >   - posted erroneous and misleading advice,
> >   - repeatedly made false accusations against others,
> >   - attempted to have those who disagree with him disciplined in
> >     their workplace,
> >   - threatened the property of those who disagree with him,
> >   - repeatedly cancelled the postings of others, and
> >   - attempted to "mail bomb" both individuals and this newsgroup.
> >
> >  His actions have been very destructive to this newsgroup, and
> >  are not socially acceptable.  He has expressed the conviction that
> >  his actions are right.
> >
> >
> >  We the undersigned join in an alt.security.alarm ignoring of Mr Bass.
> >  We will not reply to any posting Mr Bass makes as any response
> >  at all only seems to encourage him.  We request all others to
> >  do likewise.
> >
> >
> >  To add your name to ours and indicate your support for this course
> >  of action, reply by e-mail to "shunbass@xxxxxxxxx"
> >  ( that's shunbass "at" gmail "dot" com).  Email may
> >  not be answered.  Please do not respond to this message.
> >
> >  shunbass@xxxxxxxxx
> >
>
>
> Any newbie coming into the group will very quickly realize that Robert
> is nothing more than a spammer and Newsgroup Bully.  I, for one, would
> never deal with such an individual (please note there is a difference
> between *telling* someone not to deal with him, and expressing a
> personal opinion).  It's best to ignore his antics and in this you are
> correct.  Responding to him when he gets like this is like trying to
> reason with my cat and *she* is definitely evil.
>
> I'm here for the "giggles", and to share and expand my own knowledge.
> If Robert seriously desires a "truce", then he has to demonstrate he
> wants one and not threaten the Group or carry on with posting more spam.
>
> It would be nice to know who the OP of this thread is, because I don't
> want Robert to think it's one of *my* "many aliases" and I certainly
> wouldn't support an initiative by the other spammer in this Group.
>
> Frank Olson
> http://www.yoursecuritysource.com