Re: Internet Communicators

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I just got in both TG-1 and TG-4 to test, they now support SIA unlike the
TG-100

"Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Y_CNf.13979$Pv1.11525@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> They are slowly getting people to change over to the TG-4 Digital as a
> replacement for the TG-100 before the Feb. 2008 deadline. There is a small
> price increase of maybe 20-25 dollars.
>
> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:-vSdnUyrBYg23JvZRVn-vg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > I'm not sure how much longer the TG-100 will be out, they now have the
> TG-1
> > and TG-4, the TG-4 is similar to the old TG-100 and the TG-1 is like an
> > Uplink 1500
> >
> > "Bob La Londe" <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:fY2dnbQPKfoylJvZnZ2dnUVZ_s6dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > The Napco Netlink Module does trigger activated reporting for any
panel
> > that
> > > has trigger outputs.  I can tell you more about it in a couple months
> when
> > I
> > > finish the alarm in my new house as I intend to play with one.  It
works
> > for
> > > network reporting a lot like the Uplink 1500 works for cellular.  Not
> > > wonderful, but ok as a backup only.  For Napco 3200, 9600 and 255 it
is
> > > supposed to be able to do full reporting.
> > >
> > > I assume you are looking for something that just plugs in like the
> Telular
> > > TG-100 does for cellular and reports full CID or 4 X2.  If I run
across
> > > something I'll sure let you know.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > "Joe Lucia" <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:120btire0vviv52@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > I am getting hit with more requests for Internet Communicators that
> are
> > > > not specific to an Alarm Panel.  All of the Internet Communicators
> I've
> > > > seen are specific to a manufacturers panels (and receiver
> > > > hardware/software) which makes it difficult to support all of the
> > > > different internet communicators out there.
> > > >
> > > > What I think we want is a "plug-n-play" internet communicator.  I.e.
> > > > Unplug the Alarm Panels RJ31X connector from the phone jack, plug it
> > > > into an Internet Communicator box, plug the Internet Communicator
box
> > > > into an Ethernet hub, walk away (no reprogramming of alarm panel
> should
> > > > be necessary assuming it is already doing a standard Contact ID or
> Pulse
> > > > format).  The Internet Communicator should have a unique identifier
so
> > > > the C/S can attach it to an internal Account Number (regardless of
the
> > > > account number and phone number programmed into the alarm panel).
The
> > > > panel will pickup the phone line, hear dialtone (from the Internet
> > > > Communicator), dial, get a handshake, communicate, and get
kissed-off.
> > > > The Internet Communicator would then send the kissed-off signals to
> the
> > > > Central Station via TCP on the Internet connection.  If a connection
> to
> > > > the C/S cannot be established via TCP then it should not kiss-off
the
> > > > panel causing a COMM
> > > > FAIL message (just like a phone line failure would).  The Internet
> > > > connection to the C/S should be supervised periodically (like at
least
> > > > once every four hours).  Any other features I'm forgetting?  Maybe
the
> > > > ability to control a few Outputs on the module to be controllable
via
> > > > the C/S Dealer Web Access?
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone run into an Internet Communicator with this capability.
We
> > > > do this exact scenario with the AES Radio and IntelliTap module
> (replace
> > > > phoneline with radio without having to re-program account numbers or
> > > > phone numbers in the alarm panel), but I haven't seen a solution for
> an
> > > > Internet Communicator.  I'm almost done with an output module that
can
> > > > be used on any AES IntelliNet radio to control a few outputs via the
> C/S
> > > > Web Interface (for remotely resetting a fire panel or even as a
> > > > keyswitch arm/disarm for any panel).
> > > >
> > > > I've already ordered parts to make an Internet Communicator bases on
> > > > these specifications since I haven't found anything like it already
> > > > available.  If anyone is out there that can build or knows of an
> > > > existing one I'd like to hear.  I'm not in the hardware business but
> it
> > > > looks like I may be if I can't find someone else who will do or has
> done
> > > > it already.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>