Re: How does one find employees, including trainees?

["Tommy" <tommy at leesecurity dot net>]

LOL
--



Bob Worthy wrote:

>
> "Michelle" <newsgrps_REMOVE_@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:4aXhg.26922$S61.20478@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > What kind of hourly rate can a competent security technician earn
> > these days?
> >
> > I always got the impression, they don't earn much.  ( < 35K/yr)
>
> Forgot to add. Don't let an installer convince you they are a
> technician without proof of competentcy. Because they know how to
> install a system (even properly), does not constitute being a
> technician. Hell, they might even need to know Ohm's law to get the
> big bucks.
> >
> >
> >
> > cs_posting@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Tommy wrote:
> > >> I don't see it as confusion, i just feel that if you are using a
> > meter >> to find resistance, you are instinctively using the
> > formula. but then >> maybe i am equating memorization with
> > understanding.
> > >
> > > No - for starters you have to know TWO variables before you can
> > > use the formula.
> > >
> > > And for finishers, you have to need to know the remaining third.
> > > If what you need to know is right there on the meter display, you
> > > aren't using the formula.
> > >
> > > If you want to know the current, and you read the resistance and
> > > know the voltage, then you are using ohms law.  But most people
> > > would simply measure the current, unless it would be difficult to
> > > do so.
> > >
> > > If you look at the meter, see 2 ohms, and decide that given the
> > > length of the wire runs that's reasonable - YOU ARE NOT USING
> > > OHMS LAW.
> > >

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com