Re: Hypocrisy part deux

["Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>You never got into a brawl with an older brother
> or cousin and threatened violence after the ass whoopin?

That not fair to mention now. I was still eating red meat then and wasn't
the enlightened vegan I am today.

>How about letting rapists operate gynecology clinics?

I am against it. Do you know what that could do to my sideline business of
selling rohypnol and ketamine?

> and wouldn't be shocked to find out that others here have felony
> convictions.

Wait a minute now, the felony convictions I have in Russia, Mexico and Cuba
don't count, right?

>One bullshit artist has a circa 1970's Sears & Roebuck above
> ground pool behind what could only be described as a less than
> appealing residential dwelling.

Okay, from up there it LOOKS like an above ground pool, but trust me, it is
just the dog's water bowl.

> I run into CCTV slammers every day of the week who sell 4 camera dvr
> systems for under 2000.00

Man, they get to charge that much? We do it for less than half that amount.
That must be some expensive quality gear you're using up there! It must be
nice to get away with charging that much.
.


"I brive a dus" <alarminstall@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1166805984.795001.165730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Stanley Barthfarkle wrote:
>> I have nothing against DIY. I believe that most people are better off
>> having
>> a pro do the job, but some folks are technically able, while others will
>> learn a difficult and perhaps expensive lesson.<
>
> I don't like DIY but if it keeps the know-it-alls from calling my
> office then more power to them.
> Alot of guys here don't like how I market either but at the end of the
> day I seriously don't give a shit. My responsibility is to feed my
> family. I am not in this business to win a popularity contest.
>
>> What I AM against is hijacking a newgroup for one's own self-interest,
>> misleading people about your credentials and background, and allowing
>> convicted felons to operate as "security professionals". What's next,
>> then-
>> allowing pedophiles to operate daycare centers? How about letting rapists
>> operate gynecology clinics? <
>
> You're trying to equate an emotionally fueled crime (THREATENING to
> shoot a relative) with pedophilia and rape?
> How can you consider those crimes to be on the same level? You've never
> been so pissed off at a relative that you said or did something you
> regretted doing after? You never got into a brawl with an older brother
> or cousin and threatened violence after the ass whoopin? You never once
> yelled "I'll kill you" during one of those fights? The fight would
> happen one would win one would get his come uppance, and after a few
> days the whole thing would blow over.
> Does a brawl with relatives place you on the same level with a rapist
> or child rapist?
> In Robert's case the situation apparently didn't blow over. It must/may
> have been a lot worse than a family rumble if it resulted in a
> conviction, or it could have been a combination of an  overzealous
> prosecutor, Robert's not knowing when to stop running his mouth, and
> family hysterics.
> We don't know. All we can do is guess, but associating one crime with a
> sex crime is a tad extreme. It's like when I fabricated a story about
> him being questioned in Philly for pedophilia. I was laughing when some
> of the morons here took that bait and ran with it. In a matter of days
> the story became Gospel and can still be found floating around out
> there.
> Robert shot back with a loony story of his own about how I was in a New
> Mexico jail but his story didn't grow legs and ultimately fell within
> hours.
>
> I also doubt he's the only one here with a less than stellar rap sheet,
> and wouldn't be shocked to find out that others here have felony
> convictions. The difference is his poking the beehive caused people to
> check him out, and expose his skeletons. How many others would come out
> from under the same scrutiny unscathed?
>
> I always found the credentials to be a more enjoyable topic for
> flaming. Robert does his embellishing here while most of us do it in
> front of the customer. It's all a part of sales.
> Anyone in this business who denies fudging a little here and there is
> full of shit.
>
> Last night I spent some time poking around Google Earth and was
> laughing when I saw the abodes of some self-proclaimed ASA high
> rollers. One bullshit artist has a circa 1970's Sears & Roebuck above
> ground pool behind what could only be described as a less than
> appealing residential dwelling.  Another one lives in such a small
> house at first I thought it was a garage.
> So puffery happens here all the time.
> Robert's puffing is entertaining. The number of years in the business
> is my favorite because it's like waiting for the daily lotto number.
> Other guys here puff when they talk about jobs they are working on, or
> have worked on. If 10% of the shit spewed here was true there wouldn't
> be enough time for any of them to post. I have loads of free time
> because I use double sided tape and hide panels under beds but some of
> the full perimeter hardwire blowhards are doing nothing more than
> repeating stories they have heard and interjecting themselves into the
> equation.
> I run into CCTV slammers every day of the week who sell 4 camera dvr
> systems for under 2000.00 but there are guys in here boasting of the
> 10,000.00 + jobs they get contracted for. Dude I'm in NYC and these
> jabronies are in Puddlefuck Utah or some place like that. My market is
> the largest market in the world and I don't see jobs like they
> describe.
> Why don't they get called on it? Because they don't poke the beehive.
> It still doesn't take away from them being full of shit.
> This newsgroup is a house of cards with more jokers than aces.
>
> Google Earth his house though. Not too bad at all.
> If his being a pain in the ass in this newsgroup got him that house I
> doubt you will see a change in him anytime soon.
>
>> If he had simply pushed his wares, instead of people's buttons, we
>> wouldn't
>> be having this discussion. <
>
> And the place would be a snoozefest if he didn't push buttons. Look at
> that home automation newsgroup. The one with the geeks posting about
> their latest Mr Wizard exploits where they can flush the toilet by
> remote control. He behaves in there and it's like a funeral parlor.
> I said this before and I will say it again, if push came to shove I'd
> pay for his medical treatments just to keep the controversy flowing in
> here. He's like the guy who sits in the dunking booth. He pisses you
> off with his mouth and then he gets soaked when you pop the bullseye
> with the baseball. The carnival would be boring without it, and at the
> end of the day he goes home with cash.
>
> Now it appears I am in for more free time today than I expected since
> my equipment hasn't arrived yet so my choices are either watching Maury
> Povich or fussing on the newsgroup. Hopefully some of you knuckleheads
> are here to keep me entertained.
>
> Merry Christmas
>