[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rokonet versus GE

Subject: Re: Rokonet versus GE
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:10:24 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1165845958.612197.66430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <M6lfh.8100$qp1.269@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165917012.689800.140880@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <p3yfh.4652$GB1.2818@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1166015371.765286.323820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Go for the Simon, its a proven and reliable panel

"gevetri" <gevetri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1166015371.765286.323820@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Roland Moore wrote:
> > I don't know what your budget is but you might want to look at this
gear.
> > http://www.inovonics.com/pdf/2006catalog.pdf
> > From my experience it has been top of the line.
>
> Nice stuff, but I'm trying to stay with an all in one unit.
>

References:
- Rokonet versus GE
  - From: gevetri
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: Roland
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: gevetri
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: Roland Moore
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: gevetri

Prev by Message: AT&T
Next by Message: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Previous by thread: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Next by thread: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home