Re: looking for UL standards

["Steve Foley" <steve.foley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:70c4a86426675ffe47827c72d884cf7a@xxxxxxxxxxxx


> UL, in my opinion, has shot itself in the foot by making its standards so
> expensive that only manufacturers can afford them.  I promise you that you
> are going to feel ripped off when you see what you get for your $445.
>
> - badenov
>

Did you know that UL also requires the packaging vendor to be 'certified' in
order to print the UL symbol on your box/sleeve/label?

They shot the other foot too!