Re: Take Over Practices

["R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok, I see. In my day, HIS meant both genders; however, it seems things are
interpreted differently these days....you know. like the Royal we....

Damn ! I thought that post would stir up more indignation than that ! I
guess they got me figured out by now....

RHC

"mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:445559ed$0$14481$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> hahahahahahaha, don't go getting your balls all tied in a knot, Bob....
> scan down...
> you said HIS equipment and Doug caught you fair and sqaure.
> So bend over, brace yourself against that wall and take your spankling
> like
> a man.
>
> "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:qw85g.182$VV2.16678@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> How so ? I don't see anything in it relating to gender which might make
>> it
>> "sexist". I figured it would get some people going based on the content,
> but
>> never based on it being a "sexist" remark.
>>
>> Maybe I'm too "old school" to understand; maybe you young guys could
> explain
>> how its sexist....
>>
>> RHC
>>
>> "mikey" <loismustdie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:4454f25f$0$14454$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Yep, I concur... it was a sexist post, Bob.
>> >
>> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:nf25g.41$ix6.8806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Sexist ???!!! I've been called a lot of things, but never sexist
> before.
>> > But
>> >> you're right, if the equipment is leased, they can do what they want
> with
>> >> it. I understood (it seems incorrectly) that Brinks sold their
>> >> hardware...
>> >>
>> >> But sexist.....???
>> >>
>> >> RHC
>> >>
>> >> "Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:ibX4g.15296$Qz.1732@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >I find your rant somewhat sexist, but leaving that aside I didn't
> think
>> >> >that Brinks actually sold their proprietary panels, I was under the
>> >> >impression that they leased the equipment with Brinks retaining
>> >> >ownership
>> >> >in which case Brinks has every right to retain complete control and
>> > freedom
>> >> >of choice of their equipment at the end of the term without having to
>> > worry
>> >> >about the bottom feeders stealing their equipment for their own use.
>> >> >
>> >> > Doug L
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> > news:uAW4g.2873$1V4.226223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Rant "ON"..
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Where the hell are the discussions and concerns about the customers
>> >> >> rights in all this !! What right does Brinks have to sell a
>> >> >> proprietary
>> >> >> panel to a customer that doesn't allow the customer complete
>> >> >> control
>> > and
>> >> >> freedom of choice over HIS equipment at the end of the term ?
>> >> >> Answer...they don't !!
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***
>>
>>
>
>
> *** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***