[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Take Over Practices



Yep, I concur... it was a sexist post, Bob.

"R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nf25g.41$ix6.8806@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sexist ???!!! I've been called a lot of things, but never sexist before.
But
> you're right, if the equipment is leased, they can do what they want with
> it. I understood (it seems incorrectly) that Brinks sold their hardware...
>
> But sexist.....???
>
> RHC
>
> "Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ibX4g.15296$Qz.1732@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >I find your rant somewhat sexist, but leaving that aside I didn't think
> >that Brinks actually sold their proprietary panels, I was under the
> >impression that they leased the equipment with Brinks retaining ownership
> >in which case Brinks has every right to retain complete control and
freedom
> >of choice of their equipment at the end of the term without having to
worry
> >about the bottom feeders stealing their equipment for their own use.
> >
> > Doug L
> >
> > --
> >
> > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:uAW4g.2873$1V4.226223@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Rant "ON"..
> >>
> >> Where the hell are the discussions and concerns about the customers
> >> rights in all this !! What right does Brinks have to sell a proprietary
> >> panel to a customer that doesn't allow the customer complete control
and
> >> freedom of choice over HIS equipment at the end of the term ?
> >> Answer...they don't !!
> >
> >
>
>


*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home