Re: False alarms

["Norm Mugford" <1alarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Amen....

Norm Mugford

"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e4e3c257b29c13a2c368343719b2060d@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Bob Worthy said:
>
>>Read my last sentence. ECV reduces **dispatches**, unnessary dispatches.
>>It
>>does not reduce false alarms, false signals, or what ever they may be
>>called.
>
> It's been my experience that few things piss off the cops (or city
> officials) faster than when the alarm industry representative starts
> drawing a distinction between false alarms and false dispatches.  They
> will
> look at you like you're retarded, or worse, like you're trying to put
> something over on them.
>
> I know what you are talking about, but most people don't.  I think it's
> counterproductive to play word games with the general public.  When the
> public hears the term "false alarms," they think about the number of times
> the alarm industry calls the police.  They could care less how many
> signals
> you received that did not result in a police dispatch.   We should speak
> their language.
>


I choose Polesoft Lockspam to fight spam, and you?
http://www.polesoft.com/refer.html