Re: Video alarm verification

["Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

So many eyes from oh so many views have examined the reasoning of so few. An
article was just released, since some new laws hit Florida, stating that is
illegal for a city/county to charge more than what it costs to support the
governmental department. It was brought out that this one city had a 3
million dollar surplus due to exorbinate permit fees. It will be interesting
to see how this will shake out.
www.Jacksonville.com/Tuonline/Stories

"Doug L" <vssdoug@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VqidnfxdeNlYZoPeRVn-tQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In the eyes of local politicians it would probably be seen as missing an
> opportunity to fleece the taxpayer and as such would be considered
> unforgiveable.
>
> Doug L
>
> --
>
> "Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:qnATe.5158$Tn6.3069@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > If only monitored systems were required to be registered, would
> > that be considered discriminatory or selective?
>
>