Re: JIM the great DS / SD professional

["R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, some time ago (I think before you started to post), Jim asked everyone
NOT to respond to Wacko Willy's idiotic RFI posts. The idea was that if he's
a troll, no response might just convince him to leave. Now it's Jim
(apparently - because I have his posts blocked on this computer) that is
responding counter to his own excellent suggestion.

But as you say, it aint worth the time is it....hmmm....so why am I
responding.....Damn !!....the troll caught another one

RHC

"Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jz4Ve.63$yo3.14073@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I'd askyouto translatewhateverthefuuck he said but itaint worth the time
> is
> it?
>
>
> "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:3YidnWKnrqM_T7neRVn-tQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | For the first time EVER, Wireless Willy actually has a valid
> point....:))
> |
> | RHC
> |
> | -pull-@-shoot> wrote in message
> | news:mdk9i1phjjugk5o8u82rshuope89olfl5g@xxxxxxxxxx
> |
> | I thought that the subscribers where INVITED by you to go in a
> |             "DORMANT State" (DS) subject RFI!
> | Wasn't that what you asked them to do and the purpose of that list?
> | Do You escape on that DS rule?
> |
> | Paul
> |
> |
>
>