Re: JIM the great DS / SD professional

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sometimesitshard not to since he's such a baffoongabboon.


"R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_smdnYegPaUTS7neRVn-jw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Well, some time ago (I think before you started to post), Jim asked
everyone
| NOT to respond to Wacko Willy's idiotic RFI posts. The idea was that if
he's
| a troll, no response might just convince him to leave. Now it's Jim
| (apparently - because I have his posts blocked on this computer) that is
| responding counter to his own excellent suggestion.
|
| But as you say, it aint worth the time is it....hmmm....so why am I
| responding.....Damn !!....the troll caught another one
|
| RHC
|
| "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:jz4Ve.63$yo3.14073@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > I'd askyouto translatewhateverthefuuck he said but itaint worth the time
| > is
| > it?
| >
| >
| > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:3YidnWKnrqM_T7neRVn-tQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > | For the first time EVER, Wireless Willy actually has a valid
| > point....:))
| > |
| > | RHC
| > |
| > | -pull-@-shoot> wrote in message
| > | news:mdk9i1phjjugk5o8u82rshuope89olfl5g@xxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | I thought that the subscribers where INVITED by you to go in a
| > |             "DORMANT State" (DS) subject RFI!
| > | Wasn't that what you asked them to do and the purpose of that list?
| > | Do You escape on that DS rule?
| > |
| > | Paul
| > |
| > |
| >
| >
|
|